[LAD] Re: Building Bristol?
Lorenzo Sutton <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Aug 2025 13:09:44 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.audio.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 28/08/2025 12:51, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 12:29:27PM +0200, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: > >> Anyone had luck compiling Bristol [1] recently? >> ... >> So I'm wondering if the software is abandoned? Which is a pity because while >> I mostly use Yoshimi these days for 'synth needs' Bristol could definitely >> make some cool sounds with its emulated synths. > > Depends on how well they are emulated. > > Had a look a the source code. As far as I can tell (this is really > among the least readable code ever seen), all models are based on a > common set of 'operators', all using the same oscillators, envelopes, > filters, etc. Yes, well I must say I haven't used it in a while but had some positive 'auditory' memories of some of the synths, without really knowing much about its code or any 'philological correctness' of the emulation. > > I didn't find anything model specific, e.g. a Moog or ARP > filter. All the effort seems directed at having a GUI that > looks like the real thing, not at emulating the actual sound. > > So I suspect that something like Yoshimi will provide a > much more interesting choice of sounds. As said I'm indeed mainly using Yoshimi since quite a few years for my soft-synth needs, and still discovering stuff. The fact it's actively developed and has a nice friendly community around has always been a bonus. I was just curious to fire up some of the Bristol synths after some years and hear what they sounded like really, but the AUR was broken and so I thought I'd ask around in here :-) Lorenzo _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list -- linux-audio-dev-cunTk1MwBs/[email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to linux-audio-dev-leave-cunTk1MwBs/[email protected]