Re: Maolan 0.0.3

Goran Mekić <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Mar 2026 16:08:37 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.audio.users
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 3/19/26 1:10 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 09:32:24PM +1100, Roger wrote:
>
>>> I've never heard of this before, I'll have to think about it, but it
>>> definitely sounds like a good idea.
> I've wanted this once, when mxing the sound for a 90 min video
> documentary. It consisted of hundreds of short regions, and most
> of them needed some specific processing. Managed it by separating
> them over multiple tracks, each one requiring more or less the
> same effect(s), and combining this with automation.

I see how it can be useful, but I have a question how merging of clips 
should be handled? Clip split can just keep the same FX on splitted 
clips, but merge can be between clips with some or none FX that are 
common, and even if there are common FX the settings is probably 
different. I see multiple ways to handle it:

- forbid merging if one of the clips has FX
- use the FX of the first clip
- put FX of all clips into a series (or parallel)

I honestly don't like the last option. Also, I don't know if the mailing 
list is the right place to discuss it, but if anyone feels it isn't, 
feel free to comment on https://github.com/maolan/maolan/issues/31.

Regards,
meka