Re: the solicitation of opinions

On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 10:25:07AM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> > And maybe, just maybe, I'd vote for a more recent binutils if
> > H.J. comes out with something... There's been a few things happening
> > just lately with binutils for SPARC, but I'd wait for a release from
> > H.J... The cvs sources just branched off a 2.13 branch and the
> > development trunk is bumped up to 2.14.90 just yesterday...
> 
> gcc 3.2.3: looks like a bugfix release (even though none of the bugs
> seem to be sparc-linux specific). I'll see if we can safely sneak this
> in.

Well, certainly I'd suggest NOT using gcc-3_2-branch, but
gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch, such as current gcc-3.2.3-2.src.rpm.

> binutils: I dunno. I'm reluctant to go beyond where we are now
> (binutils-2.13.90.0.20-5) without good reason.

2.13.90.0.20 is certainly not that old (over a month, that is).

	Jakub