Re: the solicitation of opinions

On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Chris Ricker wrote:

> > > postfix-2.0 w/ SASL2 support -- lot more flexible than SASL1. Of course,
> > > 	it's hard to go SASL2 w/o also revving OpenLDAP....
> > 
> > Thats a pretty invasive change. Same deal with pine, if someone wants to
> > own OpenLDAP, SASL2, and postfix-2, I'll consider it, otherwise, no.
> 
> The other option here is to use postfix 2 compiled with SASL2 but w/o 
> OpenLDAP. That'd be less invasive -- depends on if people who use Postfix 
> want LDAP more, or SASL2 more.

After actually looking at the Postfix spec file used in RHL 9, it doesn't 
enable LDAP support, so if Aurora follows that lead there shouldn't be any 
problem with going SASL2 and Postfix 2.... I'm willing to own that.

later,
chris