Re: the solicitation of opinions

On Mon, 2003-04-28 at 14:55, Chris Ricker wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Chris Ricker wrote:
> 
> > > > postfix-2.0 w/ SASL2 support -- lot more flexible than SASL1. Of course,
> > > > 	it's hard to go SASL2 w/o also revving OpenLDAP....
> > > 
> > > Thats a pretty invasive change. Same deal with pine, if someone wants to
> > > own OpenLDAP, SASL2, and postfix-2, I'll consider it, otherwise, no.
> > 
> > The other option here is to use postfix 2 compiled with SASL2 but w/o 
> > OpenLDAP. That'd be less invasive -- depends on if people who use Postfix 
> > want LDAP more, or SASL2 more.
> 
> After actually looking at the Postfix spec file used in RHL 9, it doesn't 
> enable LDAP support, so if Aurora follows that lead there shouldn't be any 
> problem with going SASL2 and Postfix 2.... I'm willing to own that.

Congrats, you own Postfix-2, SASL2, and pine 4.5*. :) When you've got
SRPMS that you're happy with, let me know. I will be pushing the Aurora
rawhide tree soon.

~spot
---
Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat*com> SAIR LCA, RHCE
Red Hat Enterprise Architect :: http://www.redhat.com
Project Leader for Aurora Sparc Linux :: http://auroralinux.org
GPG: D786 8B22 D9DB 1F8B 4AB7  448E 3C5E 99AD 9305 4260

The words and opinions reflected in this message do not necessarily
reflect those of my employer, Red Hat, and belong solely to me.

"Immature poets borrow, mature poets steal." --- T. S. Eliot