Re: Fedaurora?
Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.aurora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:57:09AM +0300, Balint Cristian wrote:
> Hi !
>
> For those courios I am still keep up-to-date own rawhide based on aurora, wich is now
> something equiv to Fedora, unfortunatly not so carefully packaged/patched as corona,
> fery few patches to make tham to compile but for me works great, i encountered no problem,
> even got nptl for sparcv9 in glibc wich works nice under 2.6 :)
>
> Thanks, for courios testers (it is now even yum-ifyed, works with yum):
>
> ftp://ftp.rdsor.ro/pub/Linux/Distributions/Aurora/rawhide/sparc/
With FC1 base (or RHEL3), you shouldn't need stuff like glibc64 at all.
Just make sure rpm handles sparc64 the same way as it handles s390x, ppc64
or x86_64, then you can build glibc twice, once as .sparc{,v9}.rpm, once
as .sparc64.rpm.
You can then install both at the same time:
rpm -Uvh glibc-2.3.2-98.{sparcv9,sparc64}.rpm \
glibc-devel-2.3.2-98.{sparc,sparc64}.rpm \
glibc-common-2.3.2-98.sparc.rpm \
glibc-headers-2.3.2-98.sparc.rpm \
nptl-devel-2.3.2-98.sparcv9.rpm \
nscd-2.3.2-98.sparc.rpm
Jakub
_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-devel
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html