Re: mp3
Charles Gillet <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.aurora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Spot, You gotta do what you gotta do. I don't have much of a problem with it. In the case of Redhat 9, someone quickly made available a third party rpm that activated mp3 decoding in xmms, which is where I was using mp3 playback most. I would imagine some clever Aurora user will do the same for the rest of the community after you make the change, and all will be as it was. -charles Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > Folks, > > I've decided not to violate the GPL in Aurora. This means that I will > not be including mp3 functionality in future releases. > > I know some of you may not understand this, so I've borrowed from Mike > Harris's uber-listserv posting machine for the key points: > > 1) MP3 technology is patented, and requires a license of some > sort to be granted on paper. This means that "we haven't sued > anyone yet" and "we have a note on our website" are not valid > legal patent license grants. A written signed contract is > considered valid, whether it is granted for free, or whether > someone has paid a fee to obtain such a license. > > 2) All open source MP3 software is GPL licensed currently (at > least to my knowledge), and that means that whether you pay for > the patent licensing or not, the patent still violates the > GPL licensed MP3 decoder software no matter how you slice it. > > GPLv2, section 7: http://www.fsf.org/licenses/gpl.html > > This means that SuSE (err... Novell), Mandrake, Gentoo, Debian, > and pretty much anyone besides Red Hat are violating the GPL, either > willfully or ignorantly. Ignorance is no excuse, and willful > violation effectively nullifies the power of the GPL. > > Now, I know this sucks for the end user. I'm sorry, I've got mp3s too. > But it's the right thing to do. > > ~spot > --- > Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat*com> LCA, RHCE > Red Hat Sales Engineer || Aurora SPARC Linux Project Leader > > "The author's mathematical treatment of the conception of purpose is > novel and highly ingenious, but heretical and, so far as the present > social order is concerned, dangerous and potentially subversive. Not to > be published." -- Aldous Huxley > > > _______________________________________________ > Aurora-sparc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-devel > Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html _______________________________________________ Aurora-sparc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-devel Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html