Re: "possibly also SPARC" in Fedroa Core 2
Horst von Brand <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.aurora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Christian Joensson <[email protected]> said: > At http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/schedule/ we can read the > following: > > "We have set a very aggressive schedule for Fedora Core 2. Red Hat > considers two items absolutely "stop-ship" - that is, we will slip the > release if necessary to include them. These two items are the 2.6 > Linux kernel and SELinux functionality integrated into the > distribution. Other areas of technology that the Fedora Community (Red > Hat and third parties together) will focus on will include GNOME 2.6 > (tight schedule, particularly dependent on Gtk+ 2.4), KDE 3.2, more > Java software using gcj (Ant, Tomcat, Jakarta, Eclipse, but not > Mozilla plugins, AWT, or Swing), and integrating work on other > architectures (at least AMD64, and possibly also SPARC)." > > Which, to me, looks great. Yes, I mean the SPARC comment. > > Would anyone here, spot perhaps, comment pls on this? Mainly progress, > or status.... Nope. The right question is "How can we help to get this forward?" I'm trying to swipe an UltraSPARC that is unused around here, could volunteer some building/testing time (can't fool around to much on my machine, it is handling some services... silo-1.4.4 and my own version of modutils + module-init-tools is working fine though). Thank all very much, specially the Fedora folks! -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 _______________________________________________ Aurora-sparc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-devel Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html