Re: Re: [corona] ehrm.. sparc64 packages?

On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 08:39 +0200, Christian Joensson wrote:
> On 3/16/06, Christian Joensson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi... (spot, I guess)
> >
> > any chance of sparc64 rpm packages such as these
> >
> > glibc-devel.sparc64
> > glibc.sparc64
> > gmp-devel.sparc64
> > gmp.sparc64
> > kernel.sparc64
> > libgcc.sparc64
> > libpng10-devel.sparc64
> > libpng10.sparc64
> > libpng-devel.sparc64
> > libpng.sparc64
> > libstdc++-devel.sparc64
> > libstdc++.sparc64
> > zlib-devel.sparc64
> > zlib.sparc64
> >
> >  for the current corona?
> 
> or for xxxx :) ?

xxxx is Dennis's tree, I've not had the necessary time for Aurora+1
lately. I'm hoping to be able to get Aurora 2.0 (final) out sometime in
the near future. Also, Sun is sending us a T2000, which will
significantly help us in the "buildsystem" department.

Unfortunately, the glibc package that we're using doesn't seem to build
properly for sparc64, which is tending to cause some other dependency
issues. I'll look at it as soon as I have time, promise. :)

~spot
-- 
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!

_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-devel
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html