Re: [Fwd: Re: [corona] gnome-mount and glibc.sparcv9?]

On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 16:57 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:

> btw.
> 
> If we're going to the trouble of getting autofs v5 kernel then we should
> really be running the latest autofs release. That would be
> 5.0.1-0.rc2.1.
> 
> And there are a couple of kernel patches not yet in the kernel that we
> probably should include. Let me know if you want to do this.

We're basing Aurora off Fedora Development (soon to be FC-6), so we'll
have a 2.6.17+ kernel before we release. Also, I'm not planning on
diverging Aurora from Fedora unless there is a compelling SPARC specific
reason, so you should check and see if the autofs code bits are in
Fedora devel (and if not, open bugzilla reports with Fedora to have them
added).

~spot
-- 
Tom "spot" Callaway || Red Hat || Fedora || Aurora || GPG ID: 93054260

"We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. We must remember always
that accusation is not proof and that conviction depends upon evidence
and due process of law. We will not walk in fear, one of another. We
will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason, if we dig deep in
our history and our doctrine, and remember that we are not descended
from fearful men -- not from men who feared to write, to speak, to
associate and to defend causes that were, for the moment, unpopular."
-- Edward R. Murrow, March 9, 1954

_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-devel
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html