Re: Location of build 2.98 source rpms? (fwd)
Jima <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:01:47 -0500 (CDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.aurora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Dean Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Jima wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Dean Anderson wrote:
>>> Is someone uploading the SRPMS for 2.98 to ibiblio.org?
>>
>> Someone will, I'm sure.
>
> Figured. But glad to have reassurance.
Yeah, that was the meat of my message. (And to explain what caused the
delay.)
>> "Completely untrustworthy" seems a bit strong. If you don't trust us
>> simply because of a lack of SRPMs, you're putting your trust in the wrong
>> place.
>
> Yes, I agree, it is a bit premature to say that. But it isn't that I
> don't trust you personally. What I don't trust (without verification) is
> that your computers haven't been compromised, and that trojans haven't
> been inserted into your source code, and into your binaries. This has
> happened previously, and it's why I check sources, and make sure that
> binary RPMs match.
Out of curiosity, how are you checking if they match? rpmdiff?
>>> Spot et al: If you don't have the sources (as opposed to have them,
>>> but they just haven't been uploaded), please let me know ASAP.
>>
>> As Dennis stated, Spot is in the process of moving about a thousand
>> miles.
>
> Boston?? I'm in Boston. Do you need help? (and I mean I'll help you
> carry boxes)
Man. Talk about paying back for open source. ;-)
Jima
_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-devel
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html