Re: Kernel for 2.98 doesn't build from source rpm

BTW, in sparc32bash, it complains that unifdef is needed (which isn't 
part of aurora, so it seems (I haven't looked very hard yet) sigh.

We really need to keep better track of the source code that is used to
actually build the distribution.  One can't just plop in binary packages
without the matching source.

If you are sending flags to rpmbuild, those need to be documented. The 
scripts that you use to produce the release need to be available. 

Otherwise, things can't be built, and we are left guessing as to what
you did to produce the binaries that you distributed. Guesses don't cut
it.

Thanks!

		--Dean



On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Dean Anderson wrote:

> 
> Does anyone know what this patch does, and if this should use the same 
> patch for sparc64?
> 
> 
> %ifarch sparc
> Patch1720: linux-2.6-proc-self-maps-fix-NOUTRACE.patch
> %else
> Patch1720: linux-2.6-proc-self-maps-fix.patch
> 
> 
> rpmbuild -bp kernel-2.6.spec 
> error: File /root/rpm/SOURCES/linux-2.6-proc-self-maps-fix.patch: No 
> such file or directory
> 
> Linux supercub.av8.net 2.6.20-1.2986.al3.3smp #1 SMP Mon Mar 26 10:44:59 
> EDT 2007 sparc64 sparc64 sparc64 GNU/Linux
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Av8 Internet   Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net         faster, more reliable, better service
617 344 9000   


_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-devel
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html