Re: Kernel for 2.98 doesn't build from source rpm

On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 22:44 -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:

> This is a very serious problem.  I've said this several times, now. No
> one seems to be listening.  What's up with that? Is it that you don't
> care about security? Or you don't know how to fix the problem?

Let me repeat what I've been saying for a while now:

I'm not working on 2.98. I haven't been for more than a year now. I'm
working on 3.0, which is represented by corona until 3.0 is a finalized
release.

The 3.0 kernel and environment doesn't have any of the problems that
you're seeing with 2.98. Several of the issues are things that I've
fixed explicitly as a result of what you've pointed out.

I do care about security, but I have no obligation (nor interest) in
going back and making minor fixes in a beta tree, especially when I've
already fixed them in the "development" tree.

~spot

_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-devel
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html