Re: Re: GCC problem, take two

On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 08:27, T. Ribbrock wrote:

> > > Also, having to use the "sparc32" wrapper on a 32bit box seems off to
> > > me - it should be the implicit default IMO.
> > 
> > It is. As far as I read, you were talking about a sparc64 machine,
> > no?
> 
> Nope. First time round a few days back I did. This time (which is the
> reason I brought this up again), I'm talking about a SparcStation 20
> SMP, i.e. sun4m 32 bit. I was wondering about your answer - seemingly,
> it was a misunderstanding.

Oh. I also managed to miss the SS20 reference. Man, I'm slipping. :/

This is a case where gcc-sparc32 is missing. A fresh install of 1.0
should have gotten it with gcc, an upgrade could have forseeably skipped
it.

~spot
---
Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat*com> (SAIR LCA, RHCE)
GPG: D786 8B22 D9DB 1F8B 4AB7  448E 3C5E 99AD 9305 4260
Red Hat Sales Engineer :: http://www.redhat.com
Aurora SPARC Linux Project Leader :: http://www.auroralinux.org

The words and opinions reflected in this message do not necessarily
reflect those of my employer, Red Hat, or my project, Aurora 
SPARC Linux and belong solely to me.

Save Firefly! :: http://www.fireflysupport.com/ :: Keep Flying!