Re: GCC problem, take two

"T. Ribbrock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.aurora.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:17:00AM -0500, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> gcc-*sparc32* is just an optimization. If something builds
> when gcc-*sparc32* is installed and doesn't without that, it just means
> you don't have enough memory, because the memory footprint of normal gcc
> is between 1.5 and twice as big as the one of gcc-*sparc32* (it uses
> long long in lots of places).

Er.... <scratches head> Does 512MB (U5) or 240MB (SS20) count as "low
memory configuration" these days? :-}

On both machines, gcc filled real memory and swap (which on both
machines is 2x main memory) before being killed because of "out of
memory". Does that mean one shouldn't even attempt to use gcc-sparc64
without having at least 1GB in the machine?

Cheerio,

Thomas
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Thomas Ribbrock    http://www.ribbrock.org 
  "You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.