Re: Bacula on 1.92

Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:

>On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 09:15 +0100, Steve Blackwell wrote:
>  
>
>>I am running aurora 1.92 on an ultra 5 and it has been running perfectly for 2 years now.
>>
>>I have just tried to compile/install Bacula 1.38.11 (client) on it and
>>have got the following error messages during the configure phase of the
>>compile.
>>
>>(These are an extract)
>>/usr/include/bits/socket.h:304:24: asm/socket.h: No such file or directory
>>In file included from /usr/include/sys/ioctl.h:27,
>>                from ../bacula.h:92,
>>                from console_conf.c:37:
>>/usr/include/bits/ioctls.h:24:24: asm/ioctls.h: No such file or directory
>>In file included from /usr/include/bits/ioctls.h:37,
>>                from /usr/include/sys/ioctl.h:27,
>>                from ../bacula.h:92,
>>                from console_conf.c:37:
>>/usr/include/linux/sockios.h:21:25: asm/sockios.h: No such file or directory
>>In file included from /usr/include/sys/ioctl.h:30,
>>                from ../bacula.h:92,
>>                from console_conf.c:37:
>>/usr/include/bits/ioctl-types.h:25:24: asm/ioctls.h: No such file or
>>directory
>>
>>I have tried # sparc32 bash before I compiled and I get the same result.
>>    
>>
>
>Eww. Userspace app using kernel headers.
>
>Your best bet here would be to get the Aurora 1.92 kernel SRPM, install
>it (rpm -ivh kernel*.src.rpm), then prep the tree (rpmbuild
>-bp /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/kernel*.spec), then go
>into /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kernel-*/linux*/include/ and make a symlink
>from asm-sparc to asm. Last but not least, you'd want to add the
>following flag to the bacula compile string:
>
>-I/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kernel-*/linux*/include/
>
>In that string, you want to replace the * with the actual values in the
>path, so it looks the same as when you type `pwd` in the include
>directory of the kernel source tree.
>
>Then, bacula should get past those errors. Of course, it might just as
>likely explode again, but its step one.
>
>In the next major Aurora build, we're going to have proper kernel
>headers in place for both sparc and sparc64, so this shouldn't be a
>problem.
>
>~spot
>  
>
I just tried the process as you suggested and I got the following error 
when I tried to rebuild the rpm.

+ echo 'Patch #10000 (linux-2.6.0-compile.patch):'
Patch #10000 (linux-2.6.0-compile.patch):
+ patch -p1 -s
+ cp /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/COPYING.modules Documentation/
+ mkdir configs
+ cp -fv /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/kernel-2.6.8-sparc64-smp.config 
/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/kernel-2.6.8-sparc64.config .
`/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/kernel-2.6.8-sparc64-smp.config' -> 
`./kernel-2.6.8-sparc64-smp.config'
`/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/kernel-2.6.8-sparc64.config' -> 
`./kernel-2.6.8-sparc64.config'
+ mv kernel-2.6.8-sparc64-smp.config .config
++ echo kernel-2.6.8-sparc64-smp.config
++ cut -d- -f3
++ cut -d. -f1
++ sed -e s/i.86/i386/ -e s/s390x/s390/ -e s/ppc64.series/ppc64/
+ make ARCH=sparc64 nonint_oldconfig
In file included from /usr/include/sys/socket.h:35,
                 from /usr/include/netinet/in.h:24,
                 from /usr/include/arpa/inet.h:23,
                 from scripts/basic/fixdep.c:115:
/usr/include/bits/socket.h:304:24: asm/socket.h: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [scripts/basic/fixdep] Error 1
make: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.52457 (%prep)


RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.52457 (%prep)

This error message is very similar to the one I get when Bacula bails 
out during the configure stage.

I believe my problem is with the kernel headers, can any one give me 
some direction?

Cheers

Steve
_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html