Re: support for Ultra 80, fiber channel?

"Tom 'spot' Callaway" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.aurora.user
Organization Red Hat
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 16:30 +0000, Harold Berninghausen wrote:
> time to once again gripe about Aurora 2.0 not supporting Ultra 80 (yes,
> I know the E420 works headless and only 1.92)... and it would be nice
> to have support for fiber channel... I wish I had the background to
> help, but I don't...
> 
> Aurora 1.0 works with the U80 1 gig of ram and one processor but after
> I maxed it out, it complained about not having enough memory ..
> 
> I just thought I would bring it up...
> 
> sorry to whine... 

Feel free to send me an Ultra 80. :)

Or, tell me what driver you need for fibre channel support.
Or, tell me what driver is present but doesn't work.

~spot
-- 
Tom "spot" Callaway || Red Hat || Fedora || Aurora || GPG ID: 93054260

"We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. We must remember always
that accusation is not proof and that conviction depends upon evidence
and due process of law. We will not walk in fear, one of another. We
will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason, if we dig deep in
our history and our doctrine, and remember that we are not descended
from fearful men -- not from men who feared to write, to speak, to
associate and to defend causes that were, for the moment, unpopular."
-- Edward R. Murrow, March 9, 1954

_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.