Re: aurora 2.0 - pthreads on Aurora
Ian Kent <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.aurora.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1162822946.10271.35.camel@localhost> |
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 07:52 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Monday 06 November 2006 01:52, Ian Kent wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 22:11 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > ] > > > getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION > > > > [root@donald ~]# getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION > > linuxthreads-0.10 > > > > > you should see something like > > > NPTL 2.3.6 > > > > > > if you have glibc.sparc installed you will get something telling you the > > > version of LinuxThreads you are running > > > > > > corona has NPTL on all glibc's > > > > So it's a full upgrade to Corona then. > > Is that likely to work or is Corona too much in flux to be practical? > > > what hardware do you have? corona is not quite a full tree yet if you have 64 > bit hardware install glibc.sparcv9 OK, thanks for your time. I have an old Ultra2. Oh, I'm catching up now, it's been a while since I played with my Sun. I guess I'll need nptl-devel.sparcv9 also, yes. I seem to remember reading that the sparcv9 packages perform somewhat better on the 64 bit hardware. Is it worth replacing the ones that are available for 2.0. Ian _______________________________________________ Aurora-sparc-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html