Re: Aurora-sparc-user Digest, Vol 42, Issue 5

John Zbesko <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.aurora.user
Message-ID <1168306269.9033.3.camel@Zamd64>
Thanks for the tips! I have a Sun 501-5443 4-Port Ethernet Module 10/100
SBus on order from eBay and I'll try to install the 2.6 kernel. I hope
the graphics card issues with the 2.6 kernel have been straightened
out...

On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 12:00 -0500,
[email protected] wrote:
> Send Aurora-sparc-user mailing list submissions to
> 	[email protected]
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	[email protected]
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	[email protected]
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Aurora-sparc-user digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Ultra 1 as home router (John Zbesko)
>    2. Re: Ultra 1 as home router (Magnus)
>    3. Re: Ultra 1 as home router (Tom 'spot' Callaway)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 18:10:53 -0600
> From: John Zbesko <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Aurora-sparc-user] Ultra 1 as home router
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <1168215053.21744.4.camel@Zamd64>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> So I measured my Comcast cable broadband speed both directly to an AMD64
> FX PC and then through my Ultra 1 with 10Mbit onboard ethernet connected
> to the cable modem and a 100Mbit card facing the AMD64 (through a
> gigabit switch.)
> 
> The download speed through the Ultra is 80% of the direct connection and
> the upload speed is less than half, 47%! (4103kbps vs. 5044kbps and 168
> vs. 358)
> 
> The Ultra is running 2.4.27-3-sparc64. Firestarter is my choice for
> configuring a firewall. The Ultra is also running Apache2, X, dhcp and
> samba servers, sshd and has 384 MB RAM.
> 
> Is this expected?! Should I just give up on this obsolete hardware?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 19:19:03 -0500
> From: Magnus <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Aurora-sparc-user] Ultra 1 as home router
> To: Aurora user discussion <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> John Zbesko wrote:
> 
> > The Ultra is running 2.4.27-3-sparc64. 
> [snip]
> > Should I just give up on this obsolete hardware?
> 
> 
> Have you tried with Aurora 2.0, which uses a 2.6 series kernel?
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 19:39:22 -0600
> From: "Tom 'spot' Callaway" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Aurora-sparc-user] Ultra 1 as home router
> To: Aurora user discussion <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 18:10 -0600, John Zbesko wrote:
> > So I measured my Comcast cable broadband speed both directly to an AMD64
> > FX PC and then through my Ultra 1 with 10Mbit onboard ethernet connected
> > to the cable modem and a 100Mbit card facing the AMD64 (through a
> > gigabit switch.)
> > 
> > The download speed through the Ultra is 80% of the direct connection and
> > the upload speed is less than half, 47%! (4103kbps vs. 5044kbps and 168
> > vs. 358)
> > 
> > The Ultra is running 2.4.27-3-sparc64. Firestarter is my choice for
> > configuring a firewall. The Ultra is also running Apache2, X, dhcp and
> > samba servers, sshd and has 384 MB RAM.
> > 
> > Is this expected?! Should I just give up on this obsolete hardware?
> 
> SBUS 10Mbit is going to be slower than PCI 100MBit. 2.6 might give it a
> boost.
> 
> ~spot
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aurora-sparc-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
> Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html
> 
> End of Aurora-sparc-user Digest, Vol 42, Issue 5
> ************************************************

_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.