Re: Ultra 5 + Aurora Linux = WooHoo?

Allright. Thanks all for your feedback!

Does anyone have any opinions on power consumption, how hot it runs,  
etc?
I also have an Ultra 1 but I hesitated a bit over using it 24/7 at  
home because it eats up power like popcorn...


On 29 jan 2007, at 10.06, Joseph Simantov wrote:

> I've also had a rather positive experience using
> Aurora 1 and 2 on ultra5s, both in server and in
> desktop configurations.
>
> Probably the only negative point is the Ati Mach64
> graphic card; overall graphic quality is acceptable,
> but when working with dynamic drawings (3D), the card
> is AWFULLY slow compared with recent, equivalent PC
> graphic cards... And I am limiting my comparison to
> PCI/AGP cards...
>
> However, this problem appears also when running
> Solaris9 on these machines.
>
> BTW, does anybody know if graphic performance in
> Aurora can be improved by using a Raptor card?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Joseph
>
>
>
>
>> On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 21:54:38 +0100
>> Joacim Melin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I got me a Ultra 5 for free. Haven't booted it yet
>> (still Solaris on
>>> the disk) but I'm playing with the idea of using
>> it for something
>>> interesting. Before I start the process of
>> installing Aurora, will
>>> it run properly on the Ultra 5, and is the
>> hardware itself any good?
>>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> ______________
> Cheap talk?
> Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
> http://voice.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Aurora-sparc-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
> Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html
>

_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html