Re: Aurora on Ultra 80?
mat <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.aurora.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 08:03 -0500, venn wrote: > >> After almost four years and three million pages served our little Ultra 5 >> is starting to choke under load. I plan on trying to hunt down a Sun Ultra >> 80 4 or 2 x 450MHz - 2/4GB Ram to run Apache and MySQL and let the Ultra5 >> spend it's retirement running IMAP. I was wondering two things. Does Aurora >> run well on the Ultra80 and what would be a fair price? $450.00 seems to be >> the average on ebay. >> > > I can't really give you any ideas here. AFAIK, no one has ever tested > Aurora on an Ultra 80, and I've never purchased one... sorry. :/ > > ~spot A quick search of my archives turned up this from last year: time to once again gripe about Aurora 2.0 not supporting Ultra 80 (yes, I know the E420 works headless and only 1.92)... and it would be nice to have support for fiber channel... I wish I had the background to help, but I don't... Aurora 1.0 works with the U80 1 gig of ram and one processor but after I maxed it out, it complained about not having enough memory .. I just thought I would bring it up... sorry to whine... haroldkarl I was wondering about getting one myself recently but eventually went with some pa-risc kit instead as Aurora support looked so patchy. Cheers, -- [email protected] | www.fsck.no-ip.org _______________________________________________ Aurora-sparc-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html