v2.99 upgrade vs. Install to 3.0?
Charles Tryon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.aurora.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | Tryon Software Associates |
| Message-ID | <1183850751.3383.18.camel@merry> |
I now have a working version 2.99 of Aurora running on my U2, doing pretty much everything that I need it to do. (The system-config-something tools all seem to seg-fault, but I can work around most of those gui tools anyway.) I'm currently on a project to consolidate several smaller Intel/Linux servers on my home network on to that one box. It's actually running well enough that I trust the box to stay stable, though you can bet I'll be making lots of backups! The question then is, what do I do when 3.0 finally comes out? First, do we have any idea when 3.0 will be ready, other than, "When it's done"? Not that I'm pushing! I'm just trying to get a handle on what my options are. Second, is it likely that, given a working 2.99 install, is it going to be a matter of "upgrading", or a fresh install? Again, no one can see into the future, but is there a general rule that Beta to Full Release migrations are really only safe if you install again from scratch? -- Your Servant, B. Baggins [email protected] _________________________________________________________________________ Stult's Report: Our problems are mostly behind us. What we have to do now is fight the solutions. _______________________________________________ Aurora-sparc-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html