Re: Bind update for 2.0

On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 07:41 +1200, Tony Wicks wrote:
> >>     
> >
> > We really haven't been doing updates for 2.0, as it is based on Fedora
> > Core 3, and that release stopped doing updates a long time ago.
> >
> > It shouldn't be terribly difficult. The RHEL 3 SRPM should rebuild
> > properly.
> >
> > ~spot
> >
> >   
> I'm wondering if basing Aurora off RHEL like CentOS does rather than 
> Fedora might be a better idea for long term support purposes. Also RHEL 
> has a much less frantic release schedule that would fit in better with 
> Aurora too ? Just my 2c

To be honest, a RHEL sparc isn't very interesting to me. I know that the
CentOS folks work on and off on a SPARC port, and I've supported their
efforts in the past.

~spot

_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html