Re: Aurora 2.0b2 (iirc: became 2.0) SegFault on udev & many others .

 	Hello Spot ,

On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 09:52 -0700, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 18:02 -0700, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
>>>> 	Hello All ,  I've done a little bit of researching on this and what I've
>>>> found isn't helping .  Attached is a serial consolre record of what is
>>>> happening .
>>>>
>>>>  	I also tried 2.98 ,  and it gives me : "You do not have enough RAM to
>>>> install Aurora Linux on this machine."  ain't that nice :-( .  Sure would be
>>>> nice to know what we think is 'enough memory' .
>>> I'm pretty sure its either 128 MB or 256 MB. It's something we inherited
>>> from Fedora, not something I implemented on purpose.
>>  	Thank you for responding .
>>  	Where can I go (url/maillist/...) to suggest(/rant & rave) about having
>>  	the message respond with the appropriate value ?
>
> fedora-devel-list would probably be the closest place. Looking at the
> source, I think it might actually be 64 MB.

 	Thank you .  I'll do so .  OK ,  That means at least the other LX will .
 	As it has 96MB ,  Now if I can just figure out what is causing that
 	memory to over heat .  No it's not for lack of air flow .

>>> It should be possible to yum update from 2.0 to 2.98, not sure if that
>>> will resolve the udev failures or not.
>>  	I thought someone made the following request but I am unable to find
>>  	it .
>>  	Is it possible to 'yum update' from the install media for 2.98 ?
>
> I'd guess no, if only because the RPMS are distributed across the CDs.
> You should be able to copy the RPMS from the CDs into a single
> directory, run createrepo on them, and then use that as a local
> repository.

 	If I can get the other LX to install 2.98 I'll just swap the disks
 	around .  Thanks for the suggestion .

>>> I seem to recall that there was a update FAQ at some point, but I don't
>>> remember where it is.
>>  	And I am not able to find it either .  Tho that said ,  Is this comment
>>  	about the udev segfault or ?
>
> Yum updating. As to the segfault itself, its likely one of those things
> that is not going to be fixed in 2.0, as I'm focusing all of my time on
> 3.0 and beyond at this point.

 	Very well understand .  Found the issue with the segfaults 'prelink'
 	I read the faq & processed the suggestions and no more segfault .
 	But ,  udev still fails .  I'm digging into why that is happening now .
 	There is nothing in the FAQ about udev failures or anything about udev
 	for that matter .

> I also don't have a SPARCstation LX (I thought I did, but it was only an
> IPC). I'll drag the IPC to work this week and test some 3.0 installs on
> it.

 	Get ready to be bored spitless !-) .  I am doing this for a friend and
 	the install had been quite slow compared even to an ultra I .

 		TnxAgn ,  JimL
-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| James   W.   Laferriere | System   Techniques | Give me VMS     |
| Network        Engineer | 663  Beaumont  Blvd |  Give me Linux  |
| [email protected] | Pacifica, CA. 94044 |   only  on  AXP |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html