Re: Ultra 60 Upgrade questions
"Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <[email protected]> Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:37:25 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.aurora.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 17:17 -0400, Timothy C Hartman wrote: > > I am running aurora on my ultra 60 and was trying to get openflash to > compile. Well, on the way there I upgraded glib and some other things > that broke nash. My questions are.. Is there a way, say to place all > the 'new prereqs' of an application down a tree like /opt and then > compile against that, while still keeping the old kernel? Or .. how > do I figure out all of the dependencies for a new 'upgraded' > distribution... Or do I have to wait for a new release of Aurora? If > I have to wait for a new release of Aurora, could you use some help > from someone who can compile and test ( and is really really bad about > coding?) So, right now, we're working on the installer for a Fedora 9 tree. Hopefully, that should resolve a lot of your issues by making them irrelevant. :) In theory, it is possible to update to the newer package tree with yum on that Ultra60, but I haven't spent any time trying. Dennis Gilmore might have more information there... ~spot _______________________________________________ Aurora-sparc-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html