Re: Bridging on Netra X1

"Gary W. Smith" <[email protected]> Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:16:11 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.linux.aurora.user
Message-ID <417DD550405AF84F95040DA44520C8E5051918@pxtbenexd02.pxt.primeexalia.com>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--===============3517331288741740399==
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9597A.78931DAC"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C9597A.78931DAC
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Spot,
=20
Follow up question then.  Is there anything special I need to do to =
compile 64bit under sparc64 with 32bit userland?  Or is it just implied =
that anything compiled in that environment will default to 64bit?
=20
I'm familair with compiling RPM's and know that if I create a 32bit =
chroot it defaults to 32bit even on x64 but I've never compiles anything =
on sparc.
=20
Gary-

________________________________

From: [email protected] on behalf of Tom =
"spot" Callaway
Sent: Mon 12/8/2008 6:42 AM
To: Aurora user discussion
Subject: Re: [Aurora-sparc-user] Bridging on Netra X1



On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 06:29 -0800, Gary W. Smith wrote:
> After getting Aurora setup on one of the many Netras sitting here, I
> tried creating a bridge.  I installed the bridge-utils package and was
> able to create a bridge, add interfaces on it, and turn on stp.  This
> is something that didn't work on debian.  Anyway, it appears that
> bridging isn't working for some reason.
>=20
> Can anyone confirm if they have had any success getting bridging
> working on sparc64 using Aurora?

You may need to try building the bridging tools as 64bit, rather than
the 32bit userland that Aurora defaults to. In the past, we had similar
failures around feature functionality in iptables...

~spot


_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html



------_=_NextPart_001_01C9597A.78931DAC
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML dir=3Dltr><HEAD><TITLE>Re: [Aurora-sparc-user] Bridging on Netra =
X1</TITLE>=0A=
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dunicode">=0A=
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.3429" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>=0A=
<BODY>=0A=
<DIV id=3DidOWAReplyText31750 dir=3Dltr>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000000 =
size=3D2>Spot,</FONT></DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Follow up question =
then.&nbsp; Is there anything special I need to do to compile 64bit =
under sparc64 with 32bit userland?&nbsp; Or is it just implied that =
anything compiled in that environment will default to 64bit?</FONT></DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm familair with compiling =
RPM's and know that if I create a 32bit chroot it defaults to 32bit even =
on x64 but I've never compiles anything on sparc.</FONT></DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Gary-</FONT></DIV></DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><BR>=0A=
<HR tabIndex=3D-1>=0A=
<FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2><B>From:</B> =
[email protected] on behalf of Tom "spot" =
Callaway<BR><B>Sent:</B> Mon 12/8/2008 6:42 AM<BR><B>To:</B> Aurora user =
discussion<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Aurora-sparc-user] Bridging on Netra =
X1<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>=0A=
<DIV>=0A=
<P><FONT size=3D2>On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 06:29 -0800, Gary W. Smith =
wrote:<BR>&gt; After getting Aurora setup on one of the many Netras =
sitting here, I<BR>&gt; tried creating a bridge.&nbsp; I installed the =
bridge-utils package and was<BR>&gt; able to create a bridge, add =
interfaces on it, and turn on stp.&nbsp; This<BR>&gt; is something that =
didn't work on debian.&nbsp; Anyway, it appears that<BR>&gt; bridging =
isn't working for some reason.<BR>&gt;&nbsp;<BR>&gt; Can anyone confirm =
if they have had any success getting bridging<BR>&gt; working on sparc64 =
using Aurora?<BR><BR>You may need to try building the bridging tools as =
64bit, rather than<BR>the 32bit userland that Aurora defaults to. In the =
past, we had similar<BR>failures around feature functionality in =
iptables...<BR><BR>~spot<BR><BR><BR>_____________________________________=
__________<BR>Aurora-sparc-user mailing =
list<BR>[email protected]<BR><A =
href=3D"http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user">=
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user</A><BR>Au=
rora FAQ: <A =
href=3D"http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html">http://www.ecs=
.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html</A><BR></FONT></P></DIV></BODY></HTML=
>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C9597A.78931DAC--

--===============3517331288741740399==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html
--===============3517331288741740399==--