Confound It @ MemberDB :)

"David Lloyd" <lloy0076-t0RjpzUORie6c6uEtOJ/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.australia
Message-ID <[email protected]>
 

I am tempted to alter the code to allow "equal preferences", eg:

 

1.       I'd prefer Person1;

2.       I don't care if Person2 or Person3 get second preference;

3.       Then Person4;

4.       And finally, I don't care if Person5, Person6 or Person7 have
fourth place;

5.       There may be other candidates that I have not voted for after
this.

 

But I don't know if I could get the mathematical model right although I
know enough about voting systems to know that someone's probably
modelled this type of voting.

 

Or we could just stop having such good candidates. I suppose :P

 

--

David Lloyd

http://www.validlyodd.net/

_______________________________________________
linux-aus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.