Re: PSA: Messages sent through LA mailing lists being classified as SPAM
"Joel W. Shea" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.australia |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:50:51PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:05:27 PM Joel W. Shea wrote: > > > > Alternatively, make Mailman reject the message with a DMARC failure > > report, and hope that the sender signs with "c=relaxed/simple" to allow > > whitespace variation in the header in future. > > I don't think that there is any feature of Mailman to do this and I don't > think it would be desirable to do so. But making mailman not munge the > headers would be a good feature to have. I guess I really meant letting the receiving domain(s) enforcing the DMARC policy send the report. But I agree, it would be far better if Mailman didn't fold the whitespace in the first place. _______________________________________________ linux-aus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 473 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWl6rkAAoJEHs8nqHT5E3tw8IH/je31Ent5jot8YtrCg7Vx+E7 Qy5qMT9oc/bnDmfM/bq3Cg8n3D3kSJHKD+a+dtPkZxx1j5D3n+Xqz2pjHgGREPqg F1P7lEoKK6KE+WZQ6uA3l0HZUNoIRb5BC2teY/FYbM8M+r5EJWlg6K8j4Rdtkz4F 8MGHX4BdZY188NymTklj5G+jB2GAopwBctjp8MPJEM0FaiI/nBm2c5sii/SOq/IG jkFGrTyLNKeO2ustXE61HTcr9ymnW+ioovwy5fNRoREkLXbvotPW6ZZanGaI9tgs wUjGAC7ORvoIEN7XFz954qT0yvdahhz6K1rUn6n0MFzCF1fAaHaVbhy/kY68jaQ= =nFAr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----