Re: LA co-branding proposal
Craige McWhirter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.australia |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 08/01/16 23:47, Anthony Towns wrote: > I thought it might be interesting to write up my idea for an alternative > to rebranding LA as something more like an action plan, rather than just > a concept [0]. Great ideas. > 1) we form a new sub-committee focussing on "promotion of open source", > called either "opensource.org.au" (which LA has control of already, > AIUI), or, purely as an interim measure, "that bunch of rabid > fanatics" I've been thinking very closely along the lines of what you've written AJ but with a alight twist. I would establish that sub committee to look at forming an umbrella industry body, of which LA would be a founding member. As things currently stand, ACS[1] is the go-to body for advice to pollies and bureaucrats. They have a long standing history and are funded to give lengthy, "expert" opinion. They are generally considered *the* authoritative and representative voice of our industry. Opposition to ACS is fragmented into many small groups, with (to politicians ears and minds) strange, meaningless names. * EFA - Electronic Frontiers Australia * LA - Linux Australia * OSIA - Open Source Industry Australia[2] * DT - Digital Tasmania * SAGE-AU - System Administrators Guild of Australia These are great examples of groups with sound, complimentary and overlapping perspectives on many issues. Say their names to any member of the public or the political class and they draw blank looks. Say "Australian Computer Society" and they'll understand that on some level. So my proposal would be: * To establish that new industry body to rival ACS. * Choose a sensible, broad name. * Invite meaningful membership from a broad range of disciplines and groups. * Establish a clear charter similar to what Kathy has envisioned for LA. That's what I think will be the most successful strategy to achieve a lot of the desired objectives. I think much of what Kathy and AJ have espoused is excellent and needed. I don't see LA as the vehicle for it but it would certainly be a very active participant. [1] Australian Computer Society [2] OSIA "Open Source Industry Australia - OSA "Open Source Australia" - most politicians and many bureaucrats are not going to be able to tell them apart. It's a recipe for confusion and obscurity as things currently stand. -- Craige McWhirter M: +61 4685 91819 W: https://mcwhirter.com.au/ _______________________________________________ linux-aus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 819 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWmEePAAoJELQfpv8EzkuTE50P/jD3fHg08EjHcxMTaPkvK9S3 cteP4yNg1T6yxJGPiLTZ9SWmwNQq65ylbeHCwanS+0dlTYA73Zi3yRSo3uOnedtw s9oGqKqxnIq1QyEtRqD/jOjPi1cfDlfMzQpup8pMLLK4m7db5EneIUHvlSzYrhZd o2m2HXwnh+aTUxkWj/3JamoZFkMwDMnMElpGL5dffRP7WdqWJBCttxyGTtpqx6g6 upvQdeJPo+BB4DNV7H8x6WFmrn4sD788vWHOGGyCbda+983LkmIQZjR1oQcI6ucE hMZl0Ccm5QN8ApsyxbsZ0WDzyUL8w8FVZZKfH8Di10Gm4u7yUfFyrftbU5P7WTej CEizYOeAyW4js3xZoFfaHfBWNKyZmF0ysNWXIHMMGYBxHNzFqk6t841CCx6dtrFR k6rPMrOka0cHvV4aMyuZTWrbcx6R4G6gN16rn0cpP+MuNv8WoMnNSrt1+CVxXOfI oJlw5EM9NMZinlFk8lqsvSd/F2UzvP2sKe48OHqxav1agDOTI6dGe3VnejTW+rp6 Hu2PxygcfxFzJKbHgJUxkrslzZf1Tfnpp9kbufPZI9MqR7vmKrArWlwtOg8vDLd7 0BiMGWsvOgVqZQJc0Nl4BIemVLJL3sbmcozpM+EOUvt8LfqaqJjqT6y3qkvLGYyB hDs8UMwRoD8D6YV0nNVk =+lwg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----