Re: SPF problems too

ac <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.australia
Organization acmain
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 23:04:45 +1100
Steve Walsh <[email protected]> wrote:
> condensed email answering several complaints and addressing some
> statements;
> 
okay, you have reduced your lifetime? (or increased your max_mess?) 
we are now down to 15 minutes! - and much closer to fifo - or it is
because everyone has gone to bed and the que is empty :)
you are most welcome to send me the stats from say 30 days so that
i can help you calculate the optimal _lock batch etc.? 

all your comments below noted and everyone here seems to know that 
you are doing a bang up job (i now know that as well)

thank you  :)


> On 01/15/2016 09:16 PM, ac wrote:
> > There seems to be a bug when the sendque is calculated
> 
> On 01/15/2016 09:37 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
> >
> > AC,
> >
> > There is nothing to worry about, this list server has always been
> > slow ass,taking 20-30 mins at times to send out, clearly an issue
> > with the server itself
> 
> Mailman's Qrunner doesn't process the queue FIFO. Instead, it opens
> up the directory and processes the entries sequentially. As qrunner 
> processes stuff, it deletes those files. So as new stuff comes in,
> they get stored as close to the start of the directory inode as
> possible, so when qrunner reaches a timeout, quits and restarts, if
> it hasn't processed everything in the directory, it starts over with
> newer stuff, leaving older stuff deep into the inode -- and it'll
> never GET to that stuff deep in the inode until the system quiets
> down and it's given a change to catch up.
> 
> As I've already indicated, we're working to fix this issue, but
> that's why AC is seeing mail come in out of order. It's the way the
> software unfortunately operates. It's a bit of a stretch to jump from
> the way the software operates to indicate that people aren't doing
> their job, or that the system is broken, and just being ignored, but,
> congratulations, you made it.
> 
> 
> On 01/15/2016 08:57 PM, Russell Coker wrote:
> > Thanks for the vote of confidence in my abilities.   I do make
> > mistakes on occasion, and in retrospect just adding a DMARC entry
> > and sending mail to lists was a mistake.  But a correctly behaving
> > list won't unsubscribe people because of a mistake made by one
> > member.
> 
> In all seriousness, how will the list server know what happened here? 
> You were experimenting with DMARC, there was a configuration error
> made ( a mail server error? from RC? uh oh Brent, better find some
> tightey whiteys), and a flurry of bounces came in. Mailman did what
> mailman is programmed to do.
> 
> 
> On 01/15/2016 09:06 PM, Russell Coker wrote:
> > Also do we even have a problem that greylisting will solve?  The
> > server does SPF checks so anyone who has a SPF record with -ALL
> > won't have their mail spoofed.  The server will only accept mail
> > from subscribers so we won't have a problem of spam from random
> > addresses being sent.
> 
> As you've probably seen in the mail headers, the host is called
> "mailhost".
> 
> "mailhost" does many things for LA, of which the mailman lists is
> only a small thing. It does all the SMTP and IMAP for the LCA and
> PyCon-AU teams, and, when we have the chance, it will do it all for
> Linux Australia. It also does mail filtering for the various RT
> instances that are in use by LA, LCA, PYCON and others. This means we
> get a lot of spam. A lot. Any of the list admins will tell you how
> much spam gets through the filters as it stands, even when we're
> quite aggressive.
> 
> Add to that the amount of time it takes a conference team to police
> spam into RT queueus (hint - we spent at least 2.5 hours a week
> clearing spam out of the queues for LCA2013 as the conference
> approached and the addresses got wider and wider exposure. that's 2.5
> hours a week we're not prepping for the conference. After a while,
> that adds up), and you'll probably start to understand why mailhost
> is configured the way it is.
> 
> I'm happy to discuss any aspect of this with people at LCA, which I'm 
> sure everyone here will be attending.
> 
> regards
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-aus mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.