Re: SPF problems too

Russell Coker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.australia
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 06:36:08 PM David Bell wrote:
> Because I'm finally making an attempt to catch up on email I thought I'd
> share my perspective as a moderator/admin of the mailing lists for LCA2016
> (and lca-announce) as well as a user of mailhost for normal email.
> 
> Following this thread the admin team disabled greylisting and SPF on
> mailhost which affects mail flow into LA's mailing lists (including LCA)
> and the various inboxes used by Council, the Admin Team, and the LCA team
> (among others). Whilst mail was delivered slightly quicker, the quantity of
> spam also increased notably.

Wouldn't it make more sense to have greylisting running on the addresses that 
aren't for subscriber-only lists?  When a list only allows subscribers to post 
it won't benefit from greylisting.

Regarding SPF, what needed to be done is to have the address published for the 
council not point to a system that forwarded mail without SRS to a server that 
enforces SPF checks.

> Based on these experiences (which I'd expect the other mailman
> moderators/admins, mailhost users would echo) I'd recommend the Admin Team
> enable greylisting and SPF once again. If configured well (as I believe it
> was previously) most users should barely notice a delay as repeat senders
> do not get greylisted again within certain time frames.

There was never any serious complaint about greylisting.  Complaints about it 
came as a side effect of the list queuing issue that was delaying mail, 
greylisting got blamed for what was mostly not related to it.

SPF was never configured well.  When a server receives mail from a basic 
forwarding system that doesn't do SRS it has to be configured to whitelist that 
server.  The fact that I can now send mail to the advertised address for the 
council without it bouncing is an improvement.  But it would be better if SPF 
was configured correctly.

We currently have a problem of needless spam with James Purser's address in 
the From: field which can be simply fixed by enforcing SPF.  While that spam is 
a small portion of the spam that everyone here receives it's something that 
can be simply solved.

-- 
My Main Blog         http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog    http://doc.coker.com.au/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.