Re: Census data risks - retention and correlation of records

The ABS can and does knock on people's doors and DOES sue people who
don't give it information already; nothing particularly new about that.

And anyone who thinks they don't already keep the data is probably
living in a fairy tale world that involves drugs I don't usually take.

They're just trying to avoid getting embarrassed by an Australian
version of Edward Snowden. Or that white haired person holed up in an
embassy in the UK.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-aus [mailto:linux-aus-bounces-cunTk1MwBs8iFSDQTTA3OBCuuivNXqWP@public.gmane.org] On
Behalf
> Of Adam Nielsen
> Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2016 2:28 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Linux-aus] Census data risks - retention and correlation
of
> records
>
> > > Your responses are completely anonymous. Unlike say, an upcoming
> > > nationwide census. But that's a different topic ;-)
> >
> > Is this something we should respond to, in our broader role? It's
not
> > really an 'open' issue, it's kind of the opposite of data freedom in
a
> > sense, but it is about data privacy...
>
> It's freedom in the sense that I'm free to keep my code and identity
> private if I choose to, but apparently I'm not free to keep my
personal
> information private if the ABS come knocking.  I'm sure people
wouldn't
> be so keen on free software if part of that freedom meant you were
> free to have the full name and home address of every person who ever
> contributed to a project.
>
> Not that this is all that new, I didn't know the ABS could compel you
to
> share all your personal information either, and now that I know this,
I'm
> much less happy about the whole census in general.
> <http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/inquirer/pushing-the-limits-
> of-privacy/story-e6frg6z6-1226240259101>
>
> > I am quite unhappy about (a) the change in policy and (b) the lack
of
> > consultation in the change.
> >
> > For those who are unaware - the ABS now intend to retain your
> personal
> > information (previously destroyed) *and* correlate it with other
data.
>
> Thanks for the links, I didn't realise this change had taken place
either.
> Now I'm not so keen on answering the August census honestly, in
> protest.
>
> Maybe this year instead of everyone putting Jedi Knight as their
religion,
> we could all write "Private" and skip as many questions as possible.
> There is already some expectation of widespread civil disobedience
> because of this change, and perhaps this is the only way to get the
> message across.
>
> The fact that the ABS could still literally knock on your door and
require
> you to share this info along with the bank statements and other
> paperwork to prove its correctness still doesn't sit easy with me
though.
> I would have no problem at all if there was a choice involved, but as
soon
> as it becomes mandatory I have a big problem with it.
>
> > An ABS census hack would be the most comprehensive identity theft
> of
> > all time...
>
> I wonder how we can make that happen...?  Part of me would love to
> see all that data go public to prove that no system is perfect and
anyone
> who thinks so is a fool, but the fallout from it would be disastrous.
>
> > It is just too risky to provide key personal information on every
> > single Australian in a database that could be exploited by staff or
> > hackers, and there really is no good reason to do so. The ABS should
> > return to their previous policy of destroying personal identifying
> > data and only retaining census data itself.
>
> The only good that could come of it is making identity theft easier to
> clean up after.  It can be a headache now trying to prove you weren't
the
> one who applied for that credit card, but if every second person has
had
> their identity stolen then that process might at least become easier!
>
> Cheers,
> Adam.
> _______________________________________________
> linux-aus mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus