Re: Spam :: Linux Device

On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:17:04 +1000
Chris Debenham <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andre,
> Perhaps if you wish to be taken seriously you should introduce
> yourself more fully.
> Explain who you are, what your technical background is, links to
> source you have written /contributed to,  things like that.
> By showing a background in related development it would lend credence
> to your words.
> 
> -- Please excuse my brevity as this email was sent from my microwave

bleh, maybe I should have done that before I typed so much... from what
i typed my skill/tech background should be clear to my peers and I am
not happy about being called a spammer, twice. The second time around
even an amateur spammer, whahahahaha

I think that I have wasted enough of the lists bandwidth - If anyone is
keen on chatting with me about working together, please mail me off list 

otherwise I do apologize for wasting your bits

--
your brevity is cool, i like your microwave, mine only makes popcorn,
still trying to teach it to mail... 





 


> On 25 Apr 2016 9:40 PM, "ac" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 20:44:59 +0930
> "David Lloyd" <lloy0076-t0RjpzUORie6c6uEtOJ/[email protected]> wrote:
> > Well,
> > > Dude, seriously, you should rather top post...
> > Really? No.
> > > You posted: (i think?)
> > > that i did not read what Noel said? (i did)
> > My apologies - to be more precise, then, comprehend.
> >
> in which way then?  you simply saying that hardly explains anything...
> (or makes it so) I do understand that you believe that, but lets move
> from belief to fact? So, simply say what it is that is not
> understood/comprehended.
> 
> > > that I am redistributing spam assassin (i am not - i do not use
> > > it) that I am an amateur spammer :)
> > You're describing a product which sounds very like it.
> >
>  no, actually not. see, so you can learn something
> 
> even from a vague amateur spammer :)
> 
> SA works by 'judging'  an actual received spam - and a dnsbl rejects
> spam before your email server receives it as the sender is blacklisted
> (or accepts email on a whitelist basis - my system does that for ipv6)
> 
> there are various dnsbl
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_DNS_blacklists
> 
> SA
> https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+spamassasin&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
> 
> > > spammer 101 is vague details and appeals to emotion?
> > No, it implies you don't know what you're talking about; you haven't
> > really proved me wrong.
> >
> 
> really?
> 
> > > any linux techie with some experience can read / understand what i
> > > am saying instead of a vague accusation - why do you not say
> > > exactly what
> > is
> > > vague to you so I can explain it better ?
> > Others have done so already - why would I bother to do so myself
> > when you clearly don't comprehend what they've said to you?
> >
> 
> not sure what to say to all that. I guess, the best answer is that my
> subject is not belief or emotion or anything vague :) - it is science
> 
> you either are an expert in your field - or you are just an expert -
> everyone these days is an expert
> 
> Maybe spend the time and re-read everything that I have written and
> then if you like I can teach/help/explain something to you - but be
> exact in what you do not understand as the subjects are rather
> involved and many on the list probably know the basics already
> 
> As this is a Linux list - with many many programmers and well skilled
> Linux sysadmins - I am very sure we can all quickly figure out what is
> what :)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > DSL
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-aus mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus