Re: LCA2016 post event report

A project team delivered an 18 page post event report, with 
recommendations sourced from both a post event survey and qualitative 
observations. The report is divided into sections, and articulates key 
recommendations around the lifecycle of the linux.conf.au event for 
future iterations of the event to consider.

Instead of a debate on whether these recommendations should be adopted, 
instead we're bikeshedding over whether a Jabber IM number should be 
provided for the conference. This discussion is furthering neither the 
growth or maturity of linux.conf.au, nor Linux Australia as an 
organisation, and does not respect the time or effort that has gone into 
the event or into the production of the post event report.

I'd like to request that this thread of discussion is now refocused on 
the recommendations made in the Post Event Report, and on whether they 
should be endorsed.

Kind regards,
Kathy Reid