Re: How did non-event sub-comittees get formed?
"David Lloyd" <lloy0076-t0RjpzUORie6c6uEtOJ/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.australia |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
As Chancellor Palpatine, paraphrased, said to Queen Amidala, “Now the bureaucrats step in.” From: linux-aus [mailto:linux-aus-bounces-cunTk1MwBs8iFSDQTTA3OBCuuivNXqWP@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of James Polley Sent: Friday, 2 December 2016 11:10 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Linux Australia List <[email protected]> Subject: [Linux-aus] How did non-event sub-comittees get formed? On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Russell Coker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: On Friday, 2 December 2016 7:46:18 AM AEDT Anthony Towns wrote: > I kind of think that in practice that 95% of the reason LA is valuable > to anyone these days is that it helps people *run* events; and if so, > that isn't really valuable to that many people -- the pool of people > running open source related events in Australia (and maybe NZ) just > isn't that big. > Personally, I think of LA as an organisation run by/for open source > developers/admins/power users -- so, by and large, it doesn't make I think the problem here is that LA was traditionally an organisation for such people, but the LA council is focused on running events etc. This isn't a problem as such, changing the name to "council" with the aim of having lots of subcommittees was a good idea but it unfortunately didn't get followed through. We need subcommittees for things such as Linux advocacy. I will consider volunteering for such a subcommittee. I was about to respond by pointing to https://github.com/linuxaustralia/constitution_and_policies/blob/master/subcommittee_policy_v2.md - but on closer reading, that policy seems to be only for event subcommittees. https://github.com/linuxaustralia/constitution_and_policies/blob/master/subcommittee_policy_v1.md still refers to sub-committees that exist "to facilitate LA's operations or" as "a project undertaken with the governance of the council" Could a current council-member confirm that the "v1" policy is the policy that would apply to a Linux advocacy sub-committee? _______________________________________________ linux-aus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus