Re: Parity error between nominations and candidates?

Mark Foster <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.australia
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Can I please ask - though this explanation was very helpful (thank you), 
I don't understand why Cherie Ellis appears as a nominee but not as a 
candidate, despite having self-nominated (would this not be deemed 
'acceptance' ?)

(Apologies Cherie if i'm putting you on the spot!)

Mark.



On 26/12/2016 11:22 p.m., Katie McLaughlin wrote:
> Hi
>
> > Is it because the candidate has to accept the nomination
> > and those candidateshaven't accepted the nomination?
>
> Yes, that's correct.
>
> See Section 15) 1. a. of the Constitution 
> (https://linux.org.au/constitution) (emphasis mine):
>
> >Nominations of candidates for election .. must be made in writing, 
> signed by 2 members of the association and
> > **accompanied by the written consent of the candidate**
>
> There are a number of candidates who did not accept their nomination.
>
> The people listed under the Candidates section are those who have 
> accepted nomination, and can be voted for.
>
> Hopefully this clears things up.
>
>
> - Katie
>
> On 26 December 2016 at 20:54, Paul Wayper <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     I fear I've forgotten the answer to this, so here's a stupid
>     question: why are
>     some nominated people not candidates in the election even if
>     they've got two
>     nominations?
>
>     Is it because the candidate has to accept the nomination, and
>     those candidates
>     haven't accepted the nomination?
>
>     For example, Michael Still was nominated for the committee by two
>     people, but
>     isn't a candidate?
>
>     It would be good for any future voting system that Linux Australia
>     sets up to
>     include information like that to help idiots like me understand
>     the parity
>     error :-)
>
>     Thanks in advance, and have a good holiday,
>
>     Paul
>     _______________________________________________
>     linux-aus mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus
>     <http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-aus mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus

_______________________________________________
linux-aus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.