Re: DKIM and DMARC
Russell Coker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.australia |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 8:41:29 PM AEDT Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 19:53:31 +1100 Russell Coker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Such a change will mean that any Gmail user who receives list mail from > > another Gmail user will know that any modification of the mail could only > > happen at the list server. > > Well, apart from the fact that neither coker.com.au or linux.org.au are > DNSSEC signed, so the DNS responses for either zone could well be > interfered with ... What are people trying to achieve with all this > stuff in any csae. So far it seems that SPF, DKIM and DMARC are > causing much more pain than they are helping. You are correct that DNSSEC is the next logical step. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/