Right to Repair (draft report by Productivity Commission)
Glenn via linux-aus <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.australia |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The productivity Commission has been conducting an enquiry into the right to repair in Australia, and have come up with a draft report, available at the following link. https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/current/repair They have been looking at software related issues as a part of the investigation, and have some information requests. If you can handle responding to reports like this, or know someone who can, i encourage your to have a look, productivity commission has a lot of influence, opportunities for change in this area don't come around very often and things wont change unless we can articulate how its broken. Some key points ive noticed from a quick look, the second one (5.1) is most important which is talking about changing copyright law. INFORMATION REQUEST 3.1 REPAIR FACILITIES, SPARE PARTS AND SOFTWARE UPDATES To better understand whether consumers have reasonable access to repair facilities, spare parts and software updates, the Commission is seeking further information on: • <snip> • <snip> • whether consumers are experiencing problems using their products due to a software fault or lack of software updates, including specific examples where manufacturers have not addressed the problem because of claims that it is not covered by consumer guarantees • the costs and benefits of requiring that software updates be provided by manufacturers for a reasonable period of time after the product has been purchased. INFORMATION REQUEST 5.1 IMPROVING ACCESS TO REPAIR INFORMATION The Commission is considering recommending amendments to intellectual property laws to improve access to repair information through the options outlined in draft finding 5.2. It is seeking views on each option, in particular: • whether the proposed reform options will assist repairers in accessing repair information, and therefore facilitate third-party repair • what types of contractual arrangements that could override such reforms are most likely to be of concern • the costs, benefits and risks of pursuing each option. The draft finding its referring to is; DRAFT FINDING 5.2 OPTIONS TO IMPROVE ACCESS TO REPAIR INFORMATION There are two main options to amend intellectual property protections to improve access to repair information. • Amend the Copyright Act 1968 to allow for the reproduction and sharing of repair information, through the introduction of a fair use exception or a repair-specific fair dealing exception. • Amend the Copyright Act 1968 to allow repairers to legally procure tools required to access repair information protected by technological protection measures (TPMs), such as digital locks. This may also require the Australian Government to clarify the scope and intent of the existing (related) exception for circumventing TPMs for the purpose of repair. To reduce the risk of manufacturers using contractual arrangements (such as confidentiality agreements) to ‘override’ the operation of any such reforms, it may also be beneficial to amend the Copyright Act 1968 to prohibit the use of contract terms that restrict repair-related activities otherwise permitted under copyright law Cheers Glenn _______________________________________________ linux-aus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to [email protected]