Re: internode/iinet/tpg ipv4 bogons in route

Paul Gear via linux-aus <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.australia
Message-ID <[email protected]>
It's also very common for a traceroute not to match in both directions, 
because the ICMP time exceeded messages come from the address of the 
interface facing the source IP, and a router will usually have different 
IP addresses on multiple interfaces.  (The data can also take a 
completely different path, often depending on economic arrangements 
between the parties involved.)

For example, here are some of the hops between my router and 
route-views.routeviews.org (in Oregon).  It looks like 
TPG-iiNet-Internode peers with Hurricane Electric in San Jose, and it 
traverses the same ISP in both directions, but look at the addresses on 
the border between those two networks.

Outbound:

...
   4.|-- adl-ts3-2600-106.tpgi.com.au (203.29.135.106)               
0.0%    10   18.2  18.4  18.0 18.9   0.3
   5.|-- syd-apt-ros-int1-eth8-3.tpgi.com.au (203.29.134.67)         
0.0%    10   19.8  21.4  18.4  25.5   2.6
   6.|-- 100gigabitethernet13-1.core1.sjc1.he.net (216.218.139.233)  
0.0%    10  172.6 172.3 171.7 173.4   0.5
   7.|-- 100ge1-1.core1.sjc2.he.net (184.105.65.114)                 
0.0%    10  173.6 172.6 172.1 173.6   0.5
...

Inbound (looks different because route-views runs Cisco IOS-XE and it 
has traceroute, not mtr):

...
  13 100ge1-2.core1.pao1.he.net (184.104.195.173) [AS 6939] 16 msec
     100ge10-1.core1.sjc1.he.net (184.105.80.193) [AS 6939] 16 msec 17 msec
  14 tpg-internet-pty-ltd.100gigabitethernet11-1.core1.sjc1.he.net 
(216.218.139.234) [AS 6939] 178 msec 175 msec
     100ge10-1.core1.sjc1.he.net (184.105.80.193) [AS 6939] 16 msec
  15 tpg-internet-pty-ltd.100gigabitethernet11-1.core1.sjc1.he.net 
(216.218.139.234) [AS 6939] 175 msec 175 msec 176 msec
  16 syd-sot-ken-csw1-ge-2-23.tpgi.com.au (203.29.135.109) [AS 7545] 
[MPLS: Label 24446 Exp 0] 184 msec
     syd-apt-ros-crt4-be-100.tpgi.com.au (203.29.134.44) [AS 7545] 172 msec
     syd-sot-ken-csw1-ge-2-23.tpgi.com.au (203.29.135.109) [AS 7545] 
[MPLS: Label 24446 Exp 0] 184 msec
...

216.218.139.233 and 216.218.139.234 are probably the two ends of TPG's 
point-to-point connection to Hurricane Electric which is probably the 
network 216.218.139.232/30, but we only see one of the IPs in each 
direction.  (The /30 is just a guess, but it's not a /31, because they 
must start on the even-numbered address, and I get timeouts when pinging 
216.218.139.232 and 216.218.139.235, so it seems a reasonable guess.)

Regards,
Paul

On 15/6/22 23:33, [email protected] wrote:
> I am sure I'm not blocking the ping at my (UDM Pro) firewall, but the Fritz!box also has a firewall.
>
> Because I see the weird 10.20.21.212 hop outbound, I assumed I would see it on inbound, and thus it appeared to be the next hop to fix.
> However, no small amount of dorking about with the Fritz!Box has resulted in me figuring out that I need to designate the UDM as "exposed host".
>
> I know I should have more faith in the Unifi firewall, and I should have been happy to put the UDM into the DMZ, but I always felt marginally less insecure leaving it so that the mystical, inaccessible Fritz!box firewall was also preventing rogue SYNs from molesting my sockets.
>
> Once I enable "Exposed Host" on the Fritz, pings work, and "mtr" is able to reveal to me that there is no 10.20.21.212 hop inbound.  Just outbound.
>
> The bogon hop still annoys me -- perhaps I need to get a life.
>
>
> Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> ------- Original Message -------
> On Wednesday, June 15th, 2022 at 15:10, Paul Gear via linux-aus <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> The existence of that node on the path should not break mtr - it should
>> continue trying increased TTLs until it gets to the end node.
>>
>> Are you sure you're not blocking ping at your firewall?
>>
>> On 15/6/22 14:35, Damon Permezel via linux-aus wrote:
>>
>>> Breaks mtr.
>>> Im trying to diagnose some issues and the other party insists on mtr
>>> working from both sides.
>>> Inbound to me the 10.20.21.212 drops all pings and mtr goes no further.
>>> The ping is not addressed to 10.20.21.212. It should elicit a ttl
>>> expired icmp response.
>>>
_______________________________________________
linux-aus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to
[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.