Re: Ceph FS vs Gluster FS
Neill Cox via linux-aus <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.australia |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAD87AHUyboKuzFcQee=Zq9GoK==nimROZOJH1Pz69PR9H=uQnw@mail.gmail.com> |
My personal experience is that Ceph is much more reliable than Gluster. My experience with Ceph is with using it as a storage backend for OpenStack, so not so much with CephFS as such. My advice would be to use rbd rather than CephFS if you can. I think at this point Ceph is much more widely used and far better supported. Cheers, Neill On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 04:56, Anestis Kozakis via linux-aus < [email protected]> wrote: > I was wondering fi people could summarize me the difference as well s the > pros and cons fo GlusterFS vs CephFS inr regards to the following uses: > > File Server/System and creating Virtual Machines and Containers. > > I will, of course, do my own research, but I am looking to get other > people's experiences and opinions. > > Anestis. > -- > Anestis Kozakis | [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > linux-aus mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to > linux-aus-unsubscribe-cunTk1MwBs8iFSDQTTA3OBCuuivNXqWP@public.gmane.org -- Neill Cox Ingenious Software _______________________________________________ linux-aus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to linux-aus-unsubscribe-cunTk1MwBs8iFSDQTTA3OBCuuivNXqWP@public.gmane.org