Re: Ceph FS vs Gluster FS

The bigger question is how much storage do you need and do you need a
distributed scale out storage environment like Ceph or Gluster. Both of
these typically require 3+ physical servers in order to operate correctly.

If you're going to use Ceph with Containers look at Rook as a wrapper.
VMs - it depends on your hypervisor tooling and any live migration
requirements.
File wise CephFS is pretty stable these days and has better consistency
than using NFS/CIFs.

Steven


On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 6:56 AM Anestis Kozakis via linux-aus <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I was wondering fi people could summarize  me the difference as well s the
> pros and cons fo GlusterFS vs CephFS inr regards to the following uses:
>
> File Server/System and creating Virtual Machines and Containers.
>
> I will, of course, do my own research, but I am looking to get other
> people's experiences and opinions.
>
> Anestis.
> --
> Anestis Kozakis | [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-aus mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to
> linux-aus-unsubscribe-cunTk1MwBs8iFSDQTTA3OBCuuivNXqWP@public.gmane.org

_______________________________________________
linux-aus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to
linux-aus-unsubscribe-cunTk1MwBs8iFSDQTTA3OBCuuivNXqWP@public.gmane.org