Re: LUGs

Colin Fee via linux-aus <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.australia
Message-ID <CALCkheMyABopM2yiFWmkJangD7cmijyroXJoTZY56hTgt_Y7Gw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 09:55, Ashley via linux-aus <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 28/06/2023 10:13 pm, Russell Coker via linux-aus wrote:
> > <snip>
> > Linux is easy enough that the people who have less demanding needs can
> figure
> > most things out on their own (except printers, they still suck).  If
> this is
> > the cause of the decline of LUGs then it is evidence to suggest that the
> > majority of Linux users have less demanding needs.
> >
> > Should we try to have less of an emphasis on computer science in LUGs if
> > that's not what the users want?
> >
> I'm not sure about the other LUGs but I was a member of SLUG starting in
> the mid 90s. I think I started going to the meetings at the Sydney
> Institute of Technology in about 1996. It was here that I learned a
> great deal about Linux. My first successful install was in about '92 or
> '93 with Yggdrasil Linux and kernel 0.99.
>
> SLUG introduced me to the much friendlier desktop versions and taught me
> about such things as bash scripting and getting things working. We would
> have in depth discussions about the use of various programs such as the
> VIM and Emacs editors and, of course, other useful programs such as the
> GIMP, Mutt and Mozilla.
>
>
I wonder how the maturation on Linux distros, certainly wrt the more
popular distros, along with the proliferation of online help
communities/forums etc has contributed to the downturn of in person LUGs?


-- 
Colin Fee
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
linux-aus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to
linux-aus-unsubscribe-cunTk1MwBs8iFSDQTTA3OBCuuivNXqWP@public.gmane.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.