Re: contest proposal
Nathan Bailey via linux-aus <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.australia |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKwoNTt6sw6r5KyqVJ8ihocZuX4fD9KVaBh45XqcqUWDg3=R4w@mail.gmail.com> |
Not sure what happened to do the Google doc link <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ewp2cAZCZqgcEU92cIxUwNMxis4rbpynfqzFvapj9Ls/edit#heading=h.foatdp9emikk> , https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ewp2cAZCZqgcEU92cIxUwNMxis4rbpynfqzFvapj9Ls/edit -N On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 17:17, Nathan Bailey <web-4Bvdn4bLHr/[email protected]> wrote: > To make this more concrete/actionable: > 1. I think there is a large enough corpus of people who think this is a > good idea to pursue it; > 2. Clearly it will have more weight/value if it's officially endorsed by > LCA (which awaits a new council); > 3. There's no reason we can't develop a full proposal now for council to > review/approve when ready. > > At this stage, the following people have put up their hand in some way: > > - John Dalton > - Hugh Blemings > - Russell Coker > - Jonathan Woithe (?) > > I am also willing to contribute. > > Jonathan (or others from council), if there's a preferred format for such > proposals, please let me know. > > I have drafted a bare bones proposal and a process in this Google doc. > (Viewing/commenting is open; if you want editing access, use the 'request' > process in the Google doc) > -N > > On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 11:29, Cameron Simpson via linux-aus < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 01Jan2024 14:14, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: >> >On Monday, 1 January 2024 13:18:40 AEDT Info via linux-aus wrote: >> >> Use Firefox as an example. Installing NoScript reduces all overheads >> >> by >> >> heaps. Gone is most of the spyware, trackware, and general junkware. >> Make >> >> Noscript style controls standard built in. >> > >> >What does NoScript break? We need documentation on this, and maybe some >> >changes to defaults of OS installs. >> >> NoScripts breaks lots of stuff, largely because many sites (a) are >> totally dependent on JavaScript for the basics (there are eg >> news/magazine sites which don't even render article text unless you turn >> on some of their JS) and (b) some sites, particularly TV VOD sites eg >> CBS which pull JS from a frankly obscene number of third parties (eg >> something like 20 different sources for CBS when last I had to visit it >> some years back). >> >> NoScript lets you enable (permanently and temporarily) various JS >> sources and also disable permanently (hi facebook and google analytics). >> >> But having a functional web does require one to whitelist some JS from >> various places for various sites. >> >> I run NoScript in my firefox, and I love it. But there's per-user admin >> pain. >> >> Cheers, >> Cameron Simpson <[email protected]> >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-aus mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to >> linux-aus-unsubscribe-cunTk1MwBs8iFSDQTTA3OBCuuivNXqWP@public.gmane.org >> > _______________________________________________ linux-aus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to linux-aus-unsubscribe-cunTk1MwBs8iFSDQTTA3OBCuuivNXqWP@public.gmane.org