bug#289: marked as done (LICENSE = BSD refers to many different licenses)

[email protected] (LNX-BBC bug Tracking System) Sat, 11 Oct 2003 14:45:01 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.linux.bbc.bugs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Your message dated Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:44:57 -0500
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Too broad
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Nick Moffitt
(administrator, LNX-BBC bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.lnx-bbc.org; 23 Jan 2003 22:02:23 +0000
>From [email protected] Thu Jan 23 14:02:23 2003
Received: from zork.zork.net ([66.92.188.166] ident=mail)
	by gar.lnx-bbc.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18bpQQ-0001Nh-00
	for <[email protected]>; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:02:23 -0800
Received: from schoen by zork.zork.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18bpQa-0003sL-00; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:02:28 -0800
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:02:28 -0800
From: Seth David Schoen <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: LICENSE = BSD refers to many different licenses
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Accept-Language: en,la,eo
X-Broadcast-Flag: 1
X-Consensus-at-Lawyerpoint: http://bpdg.blogs.eff.org/
X-Cruelty-to-Analog: http://analog.blogs.eff.org/
X-Modulation: 8/VSB Is Not A Crime
Sender: Seth David Schoen <[email protected]>

Package: lnx-bbc
Severity: grave

The original BSD license has a copyright notice of the Regents of the
University of California.  Other people who have used the "BSD"
license (and have LICENSE = BSD in the gar Makefiles) have nonetheless
included their own copyright notices on their own work -- which is
appropriate.  That means that the actual text of the license of a
"BSD-licensed" work varies importantly from work to work, and they
probably can't all use the same license text!

-- 
Seth David Schoen <[email protected]> | Reading is a right, not a feature!
     http://www.loyalty.org/~schoen/   |                 -- Kathryn Myronuk
     http://vitanuova.loyalty.org/     |

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 289-done) by bugs.lnx-bbc.org; 11 Oct 2003 21:45:00 +0000
>From [email protected] Sat Oct 11 14:45:00 2003
Received: from goose.movealong.org ([69.17.22.121] ident=postfix)
	by gargoyle.lnx-bbc.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1A8RXn-00050H-00
	for <[email protected]>; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 14:45:00 -0700
Received: by goose.movealong.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id AF2D644221; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:44:57 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:44:57 -0500
From: Nate Riffe <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Too broad
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-pw: reindeer flotilla
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

This bug was too broad to begin with, and has probably been mostly
addressed (TEN MONTHS AGO).  If there are any packages remaining that
still have a license problem, please file a separate bug for each one.

-- 
--< ((\))< >----< [email protected] >----< http://www.movealong.org/ >--
pub  1024D/05A058E0 2002-03-07 Nate Riffe (06-Mar-2002) <[email protected]>
     Key fingerprint = 0DAC F5CB D182 3165 D757  C466 CD42 12A8 05A0 58E0