bug#307: marked as done (BUILD: both sh-utils and procps install uptime)

[email protected] (LNX-BBC bug Tracking System)
Newsgroups gmane.linux.bbc.bugs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Your message dated Sun, 09 Feb 2003 11:40:07 -0800
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug modified from CVS checkin
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Nick Moffitt
(administrator, LNX-BBC bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.lnx-bbc.org; 28 Jan 2003 12:49:17 +0000
From [email protected] Tue Jan 28 04:49:17 2003
Received: from zork.zork.net ([66.92.188.166] ident=mail)
	by gar.lnx-bbc.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18dVAx-0004Ud-00
	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 04:49:17 -0800
Received: from sneakums by zork.zork.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18dVB9-0005ks-00; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 04:49:27 -0800
To: [email protected]
Subject: BUILD: both sh-utils and procps install uptime
From: Sean Neakums <[email protected]>
X-Worst-Pick-Up-Line-Ever: "Hey baby, wanna peer with my leafnode instance?"
X-Message-Flag: Message text advisory: AFFIRMATION OF THE CONSEQUENT,
 IMPROPER FORETHOUGHT
X-Mailer: Norman
X-Groin-Mounted-Steering-Wheel: "Arrrr... it's driving me nuts!"
X-Alameda: WHY DOESN'T ANYONE KNOW ABOUT ALAMEDA?  IT'S RIGHT NEXT TO
 OAKLAND!!!
Organization: The Emadonics Institute
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:49:27 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Package: sh-utils,procps
Priority: wishlist

Currently the uptime from sh-utils is getting installed because it is
built after procps and therefore overwrite the uptime binary it
installed, , but if the build order ever changes or becomes
non-deterministic, this could come back to bite us.

FWIW, Debian uses the procps uptime.  The binary I get in a gar build
is about 3K versus the sh-utils uptime's 13K because it uses
libproc.so, which is use by the various utilities in the procps
package.

-- 
 /                          |
[|] Sean Neakums            | Size *does* matter.
[|] <[email protected]>     | That's why I use Emacs.
 \                          |

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 307-done) by bugs.lnx-bbc.org; 9 Feb 2003 20:44:55 +0000
From [email protected] Sun Feb 09 12:44:55 2003
Received: from inkblot by gargoyle.lnx-bbc.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18hxJ9-0005RD-00
	for <[email protected]>; Sun, 09 Feb 2003 11:40:07 -0800
To: [email protected]
Subject: Bug modified from CVS checkin
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
From: Nate Riffe <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 11:40:07 -0800

Closes 307

Make sh-utils not build or install uptime
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.