bug#297: marked as done (Nick needs Mark Lord email for his two packages)

Your message dated Sun, 20 Apr 2003 21:25:59 -0700
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug modified from CVS checkin
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Nick Moffitt
(administrator, LNX-BBC bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.lnx-bbc.org; 26 Jan 2003 00:18:54 +0000
From [email protected] Sat Jan 25 16:18:54 2003
Received: from rampart.gnu.org ([199.232.76.163] helo=spider.localnet)
	by gar.lnx-bbc.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18caVe-0001LU-00
	for <[email protected]>; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 16:18:53 -0800
Received: from bkuhn by spider.localnet with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18caVJ-0008Co-00
	for <[email protected]>; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 19:18:29 -0500
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 19:18:29 -0500
From: "Bradley M. Kuhn" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Nick needs Mark Lord email for his two packages
Message-ID: <20030126001829.GC23766@spider>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: "Bradley M. Kuhn" <[email protected]>

Package: symlinks
Severity: critical

bkuhn should forward Mark Lord's message where he vaguely indicates
that by "freely redistributable", he means "BSD license".  Mark is not
terribly interested in having a licensing discussion, it seems, so
that documentation will probably have to do and is surely good enough
(i.e., Mark doesn't like wants it to be Free Software and doesn't want
to spend time on it).

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 297-done) by bugs.lnx-bbc.org; 21 Apr 2003 04:25:59 +0000
From [email protected] Sun Apr 20 21:25:59 2003
Received: from nick by gargoyle.lnx-bbc.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 197SsR-0005cq-00
	for <[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 21:25:59 -0700
To: [email protected]
Subject: Bug modified from CVS checkin
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
From: Nick Moffitt <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 21:25:59 -0700

Closes: 297

Bradley, I'm sorry I didn't close this one earlier, but we had
already released so it wasn't quite so pressing.

	Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 22:50:46 -0500
	From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
	Organization: Real-Time Remedies Inc.
	X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
	To: "Bradley M. Kuhn" <[email protected]>
	CC: Seth David Schoen <[email protected]>
	Subject: Re: Clarification of hdparm license?

	From the same web site you quoted, the hdparm lsm file says:

	Copying-policy:	BSD License

	Cheers
	-- 
	Mark Lord
	Real-Time Remedies Inc.
	[email protected]

... and that's good enough for me.  We have received this code
from Mark Lord under the terms of the BSD License (2-clause, most
likely, since that's the "BSD License" as of the date he wrote
that mail.

I've updated the package to match.