bug#282: marked as done (DOC: provide individualized package license information)

Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2003 19:05:46 -0700
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Individualized package license information
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Nick Moffitt
(administrator, LNX-BBC bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.lnx-bbc.org; 19 Jan 2003 03:53:23 +0000
From [email protected] Sat Jan 18 19:53:23 2003
Received: from zork.zork.net ([66.92.188.166] ident=mail)
	by gar.lnx-bbc.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18a6WR-0004Eq-00
	for <[email protected]>; Sat, 18 Jan 2003 19:53:23 -0800
Received: from schoen by zork.zork.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18a6Wo-0004Vt-00; Sat, 18 Jan 2003 19:53:46 -0800
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 19:53:46 -0800
From: Seth David Schoen <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: provide individualized package license information
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Accept-Language: en,la,eo
X-Broadcast-Flag: 1
X-Consensus-at-Lawyerpoint: http://bpdg.blogs.eff.org/
X-Modulation: 8/VSB Is Not A Crime
Sender: Seth David Schoen <[email protected]>

Package: lnx-bbc

We need to include licenses and provide a way for someone to find out
what the license terms for each package are.

-- 
Seth David Schoen <[email protected]> | Reading is a right, not a feature!
     http://www.loyalty.org/~schoen/   |                 -- Kathryn Myronuk
     http://vitanuova.loyalty.org/     |

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 282-done) by bugs.lnx-bbc.org; 25 Apr 2003 02:05:11 +0000
From [email protected] Thu Apr 24 19:05:11 2003
Received: from zork.zork.net ([66.92.188.166] ident=mail)
	by gargoyle.lnx-bbc.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 198saM-0005WT-00; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 19:05:10 -0700
Received: from schoen by zork.zork.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 198saw-0002mV-00; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 19:05:46 -0700
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 19:05:46 -0700
From: Seth David Schoen <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Individualized package license information
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Accept-Language: en,la,eo
X-Broadcast-Flag: 1
X-Consensus-at-Lawyerpoint: http://bpdg.blogs.eff.org/
X-Cruelty-to-Analog: http://analog.blogs.eff.org/
X-Modulation: 8/VSB Is Not A Crime
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Sender: Seth David Schoen <[email protected]>

We now have individualized package license information, although bug
289 documents the fact that some of the package licenses are not quite
as individualized as they ought to be.

-- 
Seth David Schoen <[email protected]> | Very frankly, I am opposed to people
     http://www.loyalty.org/~schoen/   | being programmed by others.
     http://vitanuova.loyalty.org/     |     -- Fred Rogers (1928-2003),
                                       |        464 U.S. 417, 445 (1984)