Re: arch time, folks!
Nick Moffitt <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Apr 2004 19:06:36 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.bbc.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
begin Paul Gray quotation: > On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Nick Moffitt wrote: > > Paul, do you think you could go through > > http://lnx-bbc.org/arch.html and port all of the changes you made > > to HEAD to lnx-bbc--research--0.0? Inkblot will be moving his > > build script to that arch tree sometime soon, so any changes you > > made to CVS will be lost. > > Yes. Time being tight at the moment plus arch being new means that > time records won't be broken, though. That's cool. I definitely expected there to be lag time as folks switch to the new tools. I only asked publicly because I wanted to document that some changes in CVS aren't in arch right now, before everyone forgot. > Too bad Nate's not in IL yet -- I'm heading to Chi-town next week > and could take a side trip to sign keys. Yeah! I'd love to complete the web of trust! -- The insipid neologism "blog" appears to mean little more Nick Moffitt than a Web site that *actually* gets updated, as opposed [email protected] to one that *promises* to be updated REAL SOON NOW and includes an animation of a MEN AT WORK sign.