Re: arch time, folks!

Nick Moffitt <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Apr 2004 19:06:36 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.linux.bbc.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
begin  Paul Gray  quotation:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Nick Moffitt wrote:
> > Paul, do you think you could go through
> > http://lnx-bbc.org/arch.html and port all of the changes you made
> > to HEAD to lnx-bbc--research--0.0?  Inkblot will be moving his
> > build script to that arch tree sometime soon, so any changes you
> > made to CVS will be lost.
> 
> Yes.  Time being tight at the moment plus arch being new means that
> time records won't be broken, though.

	That's cool.  I definitely expected there to be lag time as
folks switch to the new tools.  I only asked publicly because I wanted
to document that some changes in CVS aren't in arch right now, before
everyone forgot.

> Too bad Nate's not in IL yet -- I'm heading to Chi-town next week
> and could take a side trip to sign keys.

	Yeah!  I'd love to complete the web of trust!

-- 
The insipid neologism "blog" appears to mean little more      Nick Moffitt
than a Web site that *actually* gets updated, as opposed     [email protected]
to one that *promises* to be updated REAL SOON NOW and
includes an animation of a MEN AT WORK sign.