Re: arch time, folks!

Nate Riffe <[email protected]> Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:38:05 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.bbc.devel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

I cannot believe Nick Moffitt said this on the ENTARNET:
> SIGNATURES:
> 
> 	The archive we set up uses gpg signatures on all modifications
> of the tree (checkins, cacherevs, etc).  This means that we'll have to
> set up a keyring of trusted signatures, but the result is that we will
> have better verification of who worked on what changesets.

I have uploaded the following key to dtype.org for purposes of signing
arch changesets:

pub  1024D/76579BE3 2004-04-19 Nate Riffe <[email protected]>
     Key fingerprint = ADE1 62C8 4308 BAF7 B2B3  70BB 8467 17A3 7657 9BE3

I have signed it using my regular key (the fingerprint in my email
sig) and I have also uploaded an ascii-armored copy of it to
gargoyle.lnx-bbc.org:~inkblot/[email protected]

-- 
--< ((\))< >----< [email protected] >----< http://www.movealong.org/ >--
pub  1024D/05A058E0 2002-03-07 Nate Riffe (06-Mar-2002) <[email protected]>
     Key fingerprint = 0DAC F5CB D182 3165 D757  C466 CD42 12A8 05A0 58E0

_______________________________________________
Lnx-bbc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://zork.net/mailman/listinfo/lnx-bbc-devel

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAhABEzUISqAWgWOARAi8ZAKC0uDuLwVs5rLJDV44rRzSVn4mSkwCePioB
pdsGrX3nZNjLBb5LlBVF3IM=
=e/bN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----