Re: Building stable on 2.6 kernel...

Nick Moffitt <[email protected]> Tue, 22 Jun 2004 07:24:19 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.linux.bbc.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
begin  Len Trigg  quotation:
> I thought that it may be a case of the stable branch being behind
> the times (i.e.: possibly using a version of phoenix prior to the
> release of 2.6) so updated the makefile to point at the latest
> firefox release instead. That died in a flaming heap as well, with
> errors that suggest that my GCC (3.3.3) is stricter than firefox is
> comfortable with. For now, I'm commenting net/phoenix out of my
> build :-). So much for being on the bleeding edge eh?

	Stable i snot on the bleeding edge.  Stable still requires the
chroot.  The research branch hopes to build in more general
circumstances, but does not quite yet.  Inkblot's got a personal
branch he's been working on that has many of the problems in research
resolved, but he doesn't want to merge it back in until he has it
building an ISO.

	It's the blotto branch at
http://www.movealong.org/~inkblot/arch/

-- 
So are you an honest-to-cripes Atkins dieter with the           Nick Moffitt
little urine test strips and the blood analysis and the   [email protected]
"better living through diabetes" rhetoric, or are you
just some ranchero wannabe who hates salads?